Print this page

When Headlines Darken but the Probability Structure Holds

When Headlines Darken but the Probability Structure Holds

The recent Stock Trends editorials argued that hard assets had become structural leaders and that capital was rotating across themes rather than collapsing into a simple risk-on or risk-off binary. This week’s data adds a new layer. The market’s probability structure has improved even as the macro headlines have become more hostile. That is a distinct signal, and it is coming directly from the Stock Trends Inference Model.

The Stock Trends Inference Model does not begin by guessing what a stock “should” do next. It begins with what actually happened before. Each week, the Stock Trends indicators classify securities by trend, momentum, and volume structure. Once enough time has passed, the database records the realized 4-week, 13-week, and 40-week forward price changes that followed those observations. Those forward returns then become the empirical sample used to estimate the return distribution associated with a given setup.

From that historical sample, Stock Trends calculates estimated return intervals and standard deviations for the 4-week, 13-week, and 40-week horizons, then estimates the probability that a current setup will exceed the base mean random return for each period: 0% over 4 weeks, 2.19% over 13 weeks, and 6.45% over 40 weeks. The website’s Select screen then applies a further filter: the probability of exceeding the 13-week base mean must be at least 55%, along with minimum price and liquidity requirements.

That distinction matters because the current data is strong in two different ways. First, the broader probability-ranked ST-IM table for March 13, 2026 contains 845 names, which is near the extreme upper end of the historical range and well above the long-run average of about 313. Second, when the website’s tighter Select screen is applied, 162 stocks and ETFs still qualify with prob13wk >= 55%. In other words, the probability set is broad, and the stricter actionable subset remains meaningfully populated.

The internal trend structure of that tighter Select list is especially revealing. Of the 162 current qualifiers, 102 are Weak Bullish and 54 are Bullish. Only a handful appear in bearish states. In Stock Trends terms, that means the highest-probability setups are not primarily fresh speculative breakouts. They are overwhelmingly established bullish structures, many of them consolidating rather than failing.

This is precisely where the present market diverges from the emotional tone of the headlines. A genuinely deteriorating market would tend to show a shrinking probability set and a larger share of bearish trend structures inside the highest-ranked names. Instead, the data suggests that many current setups still resemble historical conditions that went on to produce favorable forward returns relative to the 13-week random benchmark.

That does not mean every stock will advance, and it does not eliminate macro risk. It means that beneath the surface turbulence, the market is still generating a substantial number of indicator combinations that have historically been associated with relative outperformance. The message is not blind optimism. The message is that the market’s statistical structure remains more constructive than sentiment alone would imply.

What the Select Screen Is Emphasizing

The tighter Select screen still leans toward leadership rather than defense. Broad equity ETFs remain prominent, especially large-cap and Nasdaq-oriented vehicles, while commodity-linked and inflation-sensitive exposures are also present. That combination fits the broader pattern seen in recent editorials: not a clean risk-off retreat, but a market rotating through inflation-aware leadership while preserving a constructive intermediate-term opportunity set.

SymbolNameTrendRSIProb. > 13wk Base Mean
IOO iShares Global 100 ETF ST WeakBullishSmall 100 67.10%
SFY SoFi Select 500 ETF ST WeakBullishSmall 100 67.10%
QQQ INVESCO QQQ Trust ST WeakBullishSmall 100 67.10%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF ST WeakBullishSmall 100 67.10%
TDIV First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend I ST WeakBullishSmall 100 67.10%
CGL iShares Gold Bullion ETF ST BullishSmall 112 65.97%
HEDJ WisdomTree Europe Hedged Equity Fund ST WeakBullishSmall 103 62.27%
JCPI JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF ST BearishXoverSmall 103 62.26%
BBUS JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF ST WeakBullishSmall 100 61.81%
PBUS Invesco MSCI USA ETF ST WeakBullishSmall 100 61.81%
BKLC BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF ST WeakBullishSmall 100 61.81%
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF ST WeakBullishSmall 100 61.81%

Among individual stocks, the current qualifiers are spread across consumer discretionary, finance, healthcare, energy, industrials, and technology. That spread is important. The probability structure is not being sustained by a single narrow theme. It is broad enough to suggest that the market is consolidating within leadership rather than collapsing into uniform weakness.

SymbolNameSectorIndustry GroupTrendRSIProb. > 13wk Base Mean
CTRN Citi Trends Inc. Consumer Discretionary Retail - Discretionary ST BullishSmall 100 66.07%
SRBK SR Bancorp Inc. Finance Banking ST BullishSmall 101 65.16%
GRCE Grace Therapeutics Inc. Healthcare Biotechnology & Life Sciences ST BullishSmall 131 61.59%
MXC Mexco Energy Corporation Energy Fossil Fuels ST BullishSmall 122 59.38%
PWR Quanta Services Inc. Industrials Construction ST BullishSmall 131 59.14%
ACMR ACM Research Inc. Technology Semiconductors and Equipment ST WeakBullishSmall 123 58.38%
RY Royal Bank Of Canada Finance Banking ST WeakBullishSmall 100 60.36%
LOCO El Pollo Loco Holdings Inc. Consumer Discretionary Restaurants & Bars ST BullishSmall 113 60.52%
CMRE Costamare Inc. $0.0001 par value Industrials Transportation ST BullishSmall 106 58.74%
EDAP EDAP TMS S.A. Healthcare Medical Distributors ST BullishSmall 140 57.95%
RS Reliance Inc. Materials Steel ST WeakBullishSmall 105 57.26%

Sector Context

On the tighter Select screen, Finance, Healthcare, Energy, and Materials remain the most visible identified sector clusters, but the relative weightings tell a more nuanced story. Energy and Materials are clearly overweight relative to the known-sector universe, reinforcing the hard-asset and inflation-sensitive regime described in recent editorials. Healthcare is also meaningfully overweight, suggesting continued strength in defensive growth leadership. Finance, while the largest sector by absolute count inside the screened list, appears roughly in line with its broader market representation rather than distinctly overweight. Technology remains present but more selective than broad. This is not indiscriminate risk appetite. It is structured participation concentrated in sectors tied to inflation resilience and defensive growth.

That sector picture becomes even more significant when placed beside the trend structure of the Select list, where the overwhelming majority of names remain in Bullish or Weak Bullish states. The model is not highlighting a market driven by panic reversals. It is highlighting a market still finding historically favorable setups inside established leadership.

Sector Distribution of Stock Trends Inference Model Select Stocks

SectorUniverseWebsite Select
(prob13wk >= 55)
Universe %Select %Overweight x
Finance 1908 26 27.2% 28.3% 1.04x
Healthcare 1215 20 17.3% 21.7% 1.25x
Industrials 875 10 12.5% 10.9% 0.87x
Consumer Discretionary 654 8 9.3% 8.7% 0.94x
Energy 470 8 6.7% 8.7% 1.30x
Materials 499 8 7.1% 8.7% 1.22x
Technology 816 7 11.6% 7.6% 0.65x
Real Estate 402 3 5.7% 3.3% 0.57x
Utilities 180 2 2.6% 2.2% 0.86x

Trend Distribution of current ST-IM Select Stocks

TrendCountShare of Select ListInterpretation
ST WeakBullishSmall Weak Bullish 102 63.0% Primary bullish trend undergoing consolidation
ST BullishSmall Bullish 54 33.3% Established bullish trend
ST BearishSmall Bearish 4 2.5% Bearish trend
ST BearishXoverSmall Bearish Crossover 1 0.6% Recent bearish crossover
ST WeakBearishSmall Weak Bearish 1 0.6% Bearish trend showing near-term recovery

ETF Confirmations of the Current Macro Structure

ETFExchangeThemeEditorial Significance
QQQM Q Nasdaq 100 / growth leadership Confirms that large-cap growth leadership remains part of the opportunity set
QQQ Q Nasdaq 100 / technology leadership Shows that select growth exposures remain statistically favorable
TDIV Q Technology dividend leaders Supports a selective rather than indiscriminate technology signal
IOO N Global large-cap equities Suggests resilience beyond a narrow domestic theme
IVV N S&P 500 broad market Confirms that broad equity exposure still appears in the model
SPY N S&P 500 broad market Reinforces the idea that this is not a pure risk-off environment
VOO N S&P 500 broad market Broad market confirmation from another index proxy
SCHX N Large-cap U.S. equities Supports continued leadership in core large-cap exposure
IYY N Total U.S. equity market Suggests opportunity breadth extends beyond a few sectors
CGL T Gold bullion exposure Confirms hard-asset and inflation-sensitive leadership
PSLV N Silver bullion exposure Supports the precious metals side of the barbell structure
JCPI B Inflation-linked / CPI-sensitive exposure Fits the editorial theme of inflation pressure rather than collapse
COAL N Coal / energy commodity exposure Reinforces commodity and energy strength in the current setup

The most useful way to interpret this week’s Stock Trends data is therefore not that the macro backdrop has stopped mattering. It is that the current backdrop has not yet broken the probability structure of the market. The market may feel fragile at the headline level, but the ST-IM continues to identify a large set of current conditions whose historical forward returns were better than random. And when the stricter website filter is applied, the surviving group still clusters heavily in bullish trend states.

That is the new perspective emerging from the data. The previous editorials established that real assets had become structural leaders and that leadership was broadening through rotation. This week’s evidence adds something more precise: even under hostile headlines, the market is still producing an unusually constructive probability set. In the language of Stock Trends, the weight of the evidence still favors continuation over collapse.